King Kong [1976]
Bring the mosquito spray!
1976
Review: December 14, 2005
![]()
Director: John Guillermin
Starring: Jessica Lange, Jeff Bridges, Charles Grodin
A help, but you might want to save it til Kong appears.
THE SETUP:
Remake of King Kong, updated for the 70s.
DISCUSSION:
With the Peter Jackson King Kong coming out soon, I became excited about watching this version again. I had seen it when it came out and a few times afterward, and always remembered completely enjoying it. When I was eight [the year it came out] I remember having a “making of” book that described the mechanical arm and how they did several of the [not so special] effects. Now, watching it with a bit more of a critical sensibility, the whole thing, while still fun, is also relentlessly silly and wholly misconceived.

In this version there’s no film being made, we have an oil company heading off to the uncharted Skull Island in hopes of scoring a big load of oil. There is a lot of exposition about how there could still be an uncharted island in 1976, and, my favorite detail, a theory that the fog bank that perpetually surrounds the island is in fact created by the breath of large animals. Seems to me this crew is headed to Halitosis Island and they’d better bring a giant Altoid, but like many details, this is dropped after it gets it’s “ooh” effect and never comes up again.
So anyway, Jeff Bridges is Jack, an anthropologist or whatever who for no discernable reason thinks there’s a giant ape on the island. He is treated as though he is not flat-out insane, and he makes several arrogant speeches in an snide “I know everything” tone. He is also treated, against the evidence of our own eyes, as attractive. I guess this is the dark side of my penchant for all those bearded 70s guys. Soon enough Jessica Lange shows up in a very skimpy evening gown as a castaway from a sunken yacht. She is revived and reveals that her name is Dwan. Like “Dawn,” but dyslexic-friendly.

Ms. Lange as Dwan is relentlessly sexualized throughout the movie, and her character is written as a total nutcase bimbo. For example, she is chattering away quite happily about “how her luck is about to change” and asking everybody for their astrological sign just SECONDS after being told that she is the sole survivor of a shipwreck and that her friends have been killed. I was thinking “I hope she’s supposed to be in shock, because if not she is quite psychotic.” Nope, she’s psychotic, demonstrated soon afterward as she runs ahead of the group of explorers toward a waterfall [which she could not have seen from the angle she was at], chasing idiotically romantic fantasies [island, waterfall, hunky hippie photographer] with no regard to the fact that the day before she was shipwrecked/friends killed and now she is on an uncharted jungle island expedition where danger quite probably lurks. One feels bad for the way Jessica was treated here, but it helps one admire her all the more for being able to break out of the “boob supplier” roles and move into being taken seriously for her capability as an actress.
Anyway, after a lot of dreary “romance” with Jack [Dwan literally throws herself at him in several scenes, insultingly treating every possible situation as an occasion to begin an exotic romance], she is kidnapped by the natives of the island and made a sacrifice to Kong. One of the things that bothered me about the movie when I was eight and still bothers me about it now, is that the natives obviously just wrap vines around Jessica’s arms—they don’t TIE her up, and she could easily get free at any time. It’s details like this that ultimately preclude any attempt to take the movie seriously. Trees are shaken, the natives chant, and a big guy in an ape suit shows up.

Let’s take a moment now to catalogue a good many of the more stupid and careless elements that result in one’s inability to take this movie seriously in any way:

In this movie, Kong is a guy in a suit, and looks like a guy in a suit. Which is fine by me. But his face is frozen in an expression of demented fascination, which seemed more than a little bizarre to me. His lack of expression, along with the utter misconception of Dwan’s character, makes it impossible for the relationship between her and Kong to have any emotional resonance. I assume that this area, as well as all the sillinesses catalogued above, will be mostly what is repaired in the Jackson version, as that’s what Peter Jackson seems to do: take somewhat silly material absolutely seriously and thus wring all potential emotional impact out of it. Aside from not insulting his audience’s intelligence.

I was wondering who this director, John Guillermin, was that he is treated by the credits and the trailer as some sort of noted auteur. Turns out the interesting parts of his resume includes Shaft in Africa and The Towering Inferno [!], and he went on to direct the sequel to this version, King Kong Lives [now safely on my Netflix rental list]. I must thank this film for introducing me to the work of mustachioed sweetie George Whiteman, who assuages the role of Army Helicopter Pilot, after cementing his pedigree in the “Doomsday is Tomorrow” episode of The Bionic Woman, the “Go-Cart Terror” episode of CHiPS. He would later triumph in the role of “passenger” in Airport ’77 and “Beck” in Raise the Titanic.

Nevertheless, it was all pretty fun. It would have been a lot more fun if it wasn’t quite so needlessly long, and if we didn’t have such frequent pit stops to chart the ludicrous romance between Jack and Dwan, but it was at least SOME fun. I wasn’t really interested in revisiting the 1933 version before this [seen it plenty], but now I am. I was hoping to come out of this saying that this version is not quite as bad as it’s cracked up to be. Alas, hopes dashed.
SHOULD YOU WATCH IT?
It can’t hurt, it’s a bit of a hoot. Booze and friends will enhance your viewing experience.